Official Bank
0/90
Page
1/4
Enterprise Routing and Switchings: 65 (JN0-648) - Juniper Exam Questions
Last updated on June 20, 2026
97%
Exam Compliance
90
Total Questions
1
Question
Exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true with regards to deploying CoS? (Choose two.)
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true with regards to deploying CoS? (Choose two.)
Select 2
Options
A
You should apply MF classifiers on the LAN-facing interfaces of the routers
B
You should apply MF classifiers on the point-to-point interfaces of the routers
C
You should apply BA classifiers on the point-to point interfaces of the routers.
D
You should apply BA classifiers on the LAN-facing interfaces of the routers
Discussion
(0 comments)
to join the discussion
Community Discussion
No discussions yet. Be the first to ask!
Delete Comment
Are you sure? This action cannot be undone.
2
Question
You have PIM SM multicast configure and running in a network environment comprised of EX4300 devices. Your customer report increased delay when switching channels using IPTV. To help decrease the delay, you implement PIM join balancing. You add the set protocol pim join-load-balance command to the configuration. After committing, you notice that the flows are still using one path. In this scenario, which statement is correct?
Options
A
PIM join load-balancing also be configured.
B
The clear pim join-distribution command must be issued.
C
The interface must be specified to use for load balancing
D
IGMP snooping must be configured.
Discussion
(0 comments)
to join the discussion
Community Discussion
No discussions yet. Be the first to ask!
Delete Comment
Are you sure? This action cannot be undone.
3
Question
Exhibit.
A router is attempting to form an OSPF neighborship with another router However, the OSPF neighborship fails to establish completely Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?
A router is attempting to form an OSPF neighborship with another router However, the OSPF neighborship fails to establish completely Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?
Options
A
There is an interface MTU mismatch
B
There is an interface type mismatch
C
There is an OSPF area mismatch
D
There is an interface subnet mask mismatch
Discussion
(0 comments)
to join the discussion
Community Discussion
No discussions yet. Be the first to ask!
Delete Comment
Are you sure? This action cannot be undone.
4
Question
Click the Exhibit button. 33/68
user@router> show ospf database router extensive OSPF database, Area 0.0.0.0 Type *201.102.10.102 103.20. 01.102 080000066 0 02 Cent Router bits Ox0, link count 27 id 10.8.1.1, data 10.8.1.1, Type Transit (2) id 10.8.10.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.2.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.4.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.6.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.8.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.9.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 101.101.101.101, data 255.255.255.255, Type Stub (3) data 71.1.0.1, Type PointzoPoint (1) id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.1.1, Zype PointzoPoint (1) id 1.1.1.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3 id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.2.1, Type PointroPoint (1) d 71.1.2.0, data 255.255.255.252, Zype Stub (3 id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.3.1, Type PointloPoint (1) d 71.1.3.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3 opology count: 0, Default metric: opology count: 0, Default metric: : id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.4.1, Type PointloPoint (1) id 71.1.4.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.5.1, Type PointToPoint (1) Default metric: 1 opology count: 0 Topology count: 0, id 71.1.5.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.6.1, Type PointloPoint (1) id 71.1.6.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.7.1, Type PointzoPoint (1) id 71.1.7.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1
Topology count: 0, Default metric: Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology default (ID 0) Type: PointIoPoint, Node ID: 11.11.11.11 Metric: 1, Bidirectional Type: Transit, Node ID: 10.8.1.1 Gen timer 00:35:50 Aging timer 00:45:50 Installed 00:14:09 ago, expires in 00:45:51, sent 00:14:09 ago Last changed 00:14:09 ago, Change count: 56, Ours Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?
user@router> show ospf database router extensive OSPF database, Area 0.0.0.0 Type *201.102.10.102 103.20. 01.102 080000066 0 02 Cent Router bits Ox0, link count 27 id 10.8.1.1, data 10.8.1.1, Type Transit (2) id 10.8.10.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.2.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.4.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.6.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.8.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 10.8.9.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 101.101.101.101, data 255.255.255.255, Type Stub (3) data 71.1.0.1, Type PointzoPoint (1) id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.1.1, Zype PointzoPoint (1) id 1.1.1.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3 id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.2.1, Type PointroPoint (1) d 71.1.2.0, data 255.255.255.252, Zype Stub (3 id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.3.1, Type PointloPoint (1) d 71.1.3.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3 opology count: 0, Default metric: opology count: 0, Default metric: : id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.4.1, Type PointloPoint (1) id 71.1.4.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.5.1, Type PointToPoint (1) Default metric: 1 opology count: 0 Topology count: 0, id 71.1.5.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.6.1, Type PointloPoint (1) id 71.1.6.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) id 11.11.11.11, data 71.1.7.1, Type PointzoPoint (1) id 71.1.7.0, data 255.255.255.252, Type Stub (3) Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1
Topology count: 0, Default metric: Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology count: 0, Default metric: 1 Topology default (ID 0) Type: PointIoPoint, Node ID: 11.11.11.11 Metric: 1, Bidirectional Type: Transit, Node ID: 10.8.1.1 Gen timer 00:35:50 Aging timer 00:45:50 Installed 00:14:09 ago, expires in 00:45:51, sent 00:14:09 ago Last changed 00:14:09 ago, Change count: 56, Ours Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?
Options
A
This router is an ABR.
B
This router originated the LSA.
C
This router is an ASBR.
D
This router is connected to 27 different areas.
Discussion
(0 comments)
to join the discussion
Community Discussion
No discussions yet. Be the first to ask!
Delete Comment
Are you sure? This action cannot be undone.
5
Question
Exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit, there are multiple ASM groups in the 224 0 0.0/4 range Which configuration change is needed to ensure R1 is always the RP for group 224.224.1.1?
Referring to the exhibit, there are multiple ASM groups in the 224 0 0.0/4 range Which configuration change is needed to ensure R1 is always the RP for group 224.224.1.1?
Options
A
Configure R1 with a higher local RP address
B
Ensure R1 has a more specific group range
C
Increase the priority on R1 to higher than R2
D
Set the priority on R1 to zero
Discussion
(0 comments)
to join the discussion
Community Discussion
No discussions yet. Be the first to ask!
Delete Comment
Are you sure? This action cannot be undone.
Finish Practice?
Are you sure you want to finish? This will end your practice session.